Friday, September 07, 2018

What Am I doing In This Store?

A short while back my wife & I enjoyed a Half Family Saturday Breakfast (2 of our 4 children were there).

 

After breakfast my wife and a daughter tricked me into accompanying them to the Shoe Store across the street. Why is it that there is always a Shoe Store across the street from wherever my wife is?

 

I handled the boredom fairly well. I ended up taking a bunch of pictures of shoes. I have deleted all but 2 pictures (see below)...

Ø I found that Mrs. Spartacus shops in that store...
clip_image002

Ø I also found that Silly People shop at this store with Mrs. Spartacus.
>I often notice and then wonder about the condition of people’s blue jeans.
> When I was a child and I wore a hole in my jeans, either my Mother would install an Iron-On Jean Patch or, when I was really lucky, I would be allowed to spend $2.47 to get a brand new pair of jeans!
>Today people spend hundreds of dollars to buy jeans with pre-installed holes and then they take them home and install more holes. (Yea, I know the word “install” seems misplaced here.)
>This young lady used Paul Bunyon’s Sissors to install her holes...
clip_image004

No need to attach a comment to this posting telling me I don’t have to notice everything. I know that is true but it is really hard for me to do that when I live in a world that contains so many things that cry out to be noticed.

 

Would I kid u?

Smartfella

 

Thursday, September 06, 2018

He’s Not Really Anonymous. The New York Times Knows Who He Is. So It May Not Take Long To Find Out His Identity…Or Will It Not?

The Anonymous Op-Ed in the NYT has the World of Daytime Radio Talk Shows and Nightly News Shows in a tizzy today. We may never find out who this Mr. Anonymous is...Or will we?

The way information is leaked in the Good Ole USofA today I think he is going to be unmasked and I don’t think it will take around the 35 years it took to find out the name of Mr. Nixon’s “friend” Deep Throat.

Over the years I have written about Mr. Anonymous several times. Three of those several are listed below...

Mr. Anonymous … Keeping Us Out Of The Dark

April 24, 2009

 

Mr. Anonymous really gets around.  We owe him a lot.  Without him, we would all be like Sergeant Schultz on Hogan’s Heroes.  We would be walking around saying, “I know nothing.”

 

Being sly, cunning and alert, I am beginning to think that there is more than one Mr. Anonymous.

 

Headline: “US hostage fails in escape bid from Somali pirates”. In this one article about the U.S. Ship Captain who was being held captive by those dastardly Somali Pirates, there were all of these instances shown below of Mr. Anonymous’ contributions to our collective wealth of knowledge about the world around us…

Ø “They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss sensitive ship movements.”

Ø “spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals.”

Ø “according to Defense Department officials speaking on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to talk about the sensitive, unfolding operations.”

Ø “who spoke on condition on anonymity because he is not authorized to talk to the media.”

Ø “said the man, who asked that only his first name, Badow, be used to protect him from reprisals.”

Ø “according to a U.S. official who asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity of the situation.”

Ø “said a senior U.S. defense official who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss operational matters.”

 

Back in Grammar School we would have called this guy a Tattletale. The Mafia would call him a Rat. In modern America we call him a Public Servant.

 

If he is going around talking about “sensitive ship movements” and “sensitive unfolding operations” and “not being authorized to speak” and “operational matters” then maybe we ought to tread lightly on the “Public Servant” part.

 

If I were Mr. Anonymous’ boss, I would make the news Big Time …

Headline … “Mean Boss Fires Public Servant”

 

Would I kid u?

Smartfella

 

If you have not had enough of me as of yet, here are two more...

 

10/30/09

https://forii.blogspot.com/2009/10/mr-anonymous-now-has-rule-of-law-on-his.html

 

5/6/18

https://forii.blogspot.com/2018/05/anonymous-lawyeringanother-step-on-road.html

 

Would I kid u 3 times?

Smartfella

 

Sunday, September 02, 2018

I Admit I Am Guilty Of Blackmail But Blackmail Did Make Me A Lot Of Money, So It Is Justified Blackmail

Super Beets is vying with GEICO for most TV Commercials. Some of its claims are:

Ø Boosts circulation in the body.

Ø Helps to improve stamina.

Ø Helps to improve energy levels.

 

I made my big bunch of Blackmail Money by walking into Super Beets Super Headquarters and threatening to tell the world that Actual Beets That Grow In The Ground Have Been Invented.

 

The look on their faces was priceless!

 

It was not priceless because it cost them a lot of Blackmail Money.

 

I may be branching out with this Blackmailing Idea. I see where my local Big Box Warehouse Selling Place is selling Feeding Pouches of...

Ø Apple& Broccoli.

Ø Peach, Banana & Apricot.

 

Do you get my drift? That’s right. I going to threaten to tell the world that Apples, Broccoli, Peaches, Bananas and Apricots are already on the market in Non-Pouch Form.

 

I am going to hold off till next year because I don’t want to get in too high an Income Tax Bracket for this year.

 

Would I kid u?

Smartfella

 


Friday, August 31, 2018

Be Careful About Your Monkey Business

The Talk Show and Political Worlds were in a Sustained Tizzy about the word “Monkey” yesterday. I won’t even peck out a single word about what happened yesterday because too many people were (and are still) too excited about what happened yesterday and I am convinced that there can be no Sanity at the end of that Foolish Road.

 

I’ll just concentrate my Foolishness on the word “Monkey” itself.

 

I went online and came up with this from Oxford Dictionaries...

9 Monkey Phrases and Their Meanings

1.   Cold Enough to Freeze the Balls off a Brass Monkey
>This “monkey” actually refers to the brass pyramid-like rack (called a monkey) that was once used to stack cannon balls on a ship.
>In extreme cold, the brass would contract and often force the cannon balls to roll out of the stack.

2.   Monkey House
>Refers to the building in a zoo that houses the monkeys.
>By the early 20th century it was used to refer to buildings housing humans as well.
> It has been used as a satirical term for political institutions, such as Parliament or Congress.
>It has also been used as slang for Psychiatric Hospitals and Prisons.

3.   Monkey Business
>Refers to fooling around or any sort of mischievous behavior, ranging from bribery in politics to kissing.
>As a verb it means to behave in a silly or playful way or to tamper with something.

4.   Monkey Wrench
>The exact reasons why this adjustable wrench ended up being called a Monkey Wrench are still disputed.
>Any straightforward sense of utility is thrown slightly askew by the wrench’s appearance in the phrase, “To throw a monkey wrench in the works”.
>This term comes down to referring to the creation of an obstruction or hindrance.
>Probably the same obstruction or hindrance could have been accomplished with a pliers or a screw driver.

5.   Monkey See, Monkey Do
>Monkeys (the non-human animals) are known to do Basic Imitation.
>Basic Imitation means the imitator simply copies an action and does not actually understand the reason or process.

6.   More Fun than a Barrel of Monkeys
>Whether a cage, box, bag, barrel, or wagonload, this term brings up an image joy mixed with confusion.

7.   Well, I’ll Be a Monkey’s Uncle!
>Used to express surprise or disbelief.
>Probably dates to 1925, the year of the Scopes Monkey trial, a landmark court case in Tennessee over the legality of teaching evolution in a state-funded school.

8.    Monkey’s Wedding
>This South African phrase refers to the weather phenomenon of simultaneous rain and sunshine.

9.   A Monkey on One’s Back
>This phrase started off specifically as an allusion to a drug problem (“monkey” referring to the addiction or the symptoms of withdrawal).
>Eventually it came to refer to any problem or issue that was a burden to someone.

Do you see what’s missing? ... There is no reference to Race or Racism in any of these 9 Monkey Phrases.

 

Oh well, who’s ever heard of the Oxford Dictionary anyway.

 

Would I kid u?

Smartfella

 

Lagniappe: If we can’t say “monkey”, what do we call a Monkey (the non-human animal that looks like a Monkey)?

Monday, August 27, 2018

Car Commercials Then And Now

I know of which I speak because I spent more than 30 years rising to the height of a Mediocre Automotive Career.

 

Back in my day we knew how to make Automotive Commercials...Or did we?

 

To me today’s Automotive Commercials are strange...

Ø They show the car we ought to buy driving through the downtown streets of major metropolitan cities but the streets are empty, except for the car we ought to buy...
>Why are the streets empty?

Ø The car we ought to buy almost hits a lonely pedestrian walking across the empty commercial street...
>The reason the car was stopped before hitting the lonely pedestrian is because the car’s computers stopped the car.
>The reason the driver did not stop the car is because he never expected to see anyone walking across the empty commercial street.

Ø Now commercials show cars sliding sideways on frozen lakes...
>Why is the car we ought to buy driving on a frozen lake?
>Why would we want to buy a car because it can slide sideways on a frozen lake?
>Henry Ford’s Model T could slide sideways on a frozen lake without 27 computers installed.

Ø Today’s commercials show the car we ought to buy driving fast through a mess of leaves so that the leaves are disturbed and fly all around as the car we ought to buy drives fast through them...
>Is it the implication of this technique that the competitor’s cars could not make the leaves fly all around as they drove fast through the leaves, therefore, we ought to buy the car we ought to buy because the cars we don’t want to buy can’t disturb leaves?

Ø We see a family of 5 driving along all happily hooked up to the electronic devices of their choice and no one is talking to anyone else (especially the driving father)...
>Actually I understand the selling feature of this bullet point for the not-spoken-to- father.
> The happy children are so enraptured with their electronics that they don’t pester the not-spoken-to- father with, “Are we there yet?”
>
Actually they really don’t want to be there yet because, if they were there yet, they would have to stop enjoying their electronics for a few minutes.

Ø One of latest commercial techniques is to show cars driving on bridges...
>Is this sales technique trying to imply that the competitive cars cannot drive on bridges?
>I don’t know about you but I certainly will not buy a car whose computers stopped it at the entrances to all bridges.

 

Back in the Mediocre Old Years we used to ask the customers to buy our cars because they were good cars and we told them why they were good cars.

 

I guess that’s why we and our commercials are sitting atop the Ash Heap of History.

 

Would I kid u?

Smartfella

Thursday, August 23, 2018

Let Me See If I Understand This Foolishness Correctly

Currently there is a TV commercial running that says the price of Silver will hit an all time high in the relatively near future. When it does those of us who own a bunch of Silver are going to become Stinking Rich.

 

The Sponsor of the commercial has a bunch of Silver and he is offering to sell it to us for a price that is far below what it will be when it gets to its all time high in the relatively near future.

 

I know I claim to be smart and I also know that a few of you have doubts about just how smart I am. I guarantee I am smarter than the Sponsor of this commercial.

 

If I owned a whole bunch of something that I knew was going to shoot up in price in the relatively near future, I sure as hell would not be willing to sell it to you at what is going to prove to have been a Bargain Price in the relatively near future!

 

I see that a whole bunch of you now get my drift because I just heard that bunch of you say to your collective selves, “No way, Jose, I would hold onto all that Silver until the Relatively Near Future has become the Recent Past and I would sell it at its all-time high and I would become Stinking Rich”.

 

It’s not Rocket Science.

 

Would I kid u?

Smartfella

 

Monday, August 20, 2018

Why Are They Treating Us Like Mushrooms?

This bit of Foolishness was written a few years ago when our economy was in the dumpster.

************************

You say you don’t know what it means to be treated like a mushroom. Your Mushroom Education is about to begin.

You are being treated like a Mushroom if you are being kept in the dark and being covered up with bullchit.

My newspaper recently had an article about the First Quarter U.S. Economy shrinking by 2.9%. From the headline itself we start getting the chit thrown our way...

Economy Shrinks In First Quarter, But Growing Again

In the World of Control (patterned after George Orwell’s 1984) this headline is intended to keep us sheep from recognizing the truly disastrous situation we very well might be headed into and, worst of all, keep us from doing anything about it because it is Already OK (...“but growing again”).

Then in the body of the article they insulted our intelligence when they blamed Winter for the decline. Even Fox News (Fair and Balanced and Sometimes Not Too Sharp) parroted this silliness on TV recently. Not one of the Fair and Balanced Talking Heads missed a syllable as I was shouting at the TV, “It gets cold every Winter!” They acted as if they did not hear a word I was shouting.

It gets worse. The Winter Excuse was expanded upon in my newspaper the next day...

The economy was held back by an Unusually Cold Winter, the Expiration of Long-Term Unemployment Benefits and Cuts to Food Stamps, which Curbed Consumer Spending.

There you have it. There is a nutshell is the Good Ole USofA’s  Plan For Prosperity...

Ø We must prevent winter from ever coming again.

Ø We must continue and increase long-term unemployment benefits forever.

Ø We must increase food stamps dependency.

How can you argue with that logic?

Would I kid u?

Smartfella

Wednesday, August 15, 2018

I’ve Never Believed I Should Put My Money Where No Man’s Money Has Gone Before

There I was in this guy’s Very Big Impressive Palatial Office. He was selling me hard on how I should invest all of my money in his Bitcoin Cryptocurrency. He was a very high-pressure salesman and he laid out for me the benefits of the Bitcoin by use of a series of questions and probing statements. You would be proud of me. I handled everything he threw at me...

  • Palatial Office Guy (POG)... Do you want to join up with the stinking rich?
  • Me... Huh?
  • POG... Do you want me to tell you the best part?
  • Me... Huh?
  • POG... To become stinking rich you do not even have to know what you are doing because you have me!
  • Me... Huh?
  • POG... You just have to trust me, give me all your money and I will handle the rest for you!
  • Me... Huh?
  • POG... You just put your trust in me and, before you know it, you will have a Palatial Office as big as mine!
  • Me... Huh?
  • POG... Of course, there may be some dramatic fluctuations in the value of your Crypto Nest Egg but I promise you Bitcoin will always bounce back higher than where it was before it dropped like a rock!
  • Me... Huh?
  • POG... Did I say you had to trust me?

************************

I hope I have not confused you. Watch this video and it will all be made clear in your mind...Or will it?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeMv9uKpAZg&feature=youtu.be

 

If that confused you, this one will be better. Trust me.

https://youtu.be/4APcgsRdW6w

 

Would I kid u?

Smartfella

 

Sunday, August 12, 2018

An Exercise In Arithmetic, Mathematics and Logic

I will never stop reading what members of our Congress have to say about anything and everything. It is so educational! I love to be educated! I just love to be smart! 

In this case this bit of Making Me Smarter is from a candidate for Congress who is not yet a Member of Congress but she’s going to be. Can you imagine how much smarter she will be after she gets into Congress!

 

There I go getting ahead of you. It’s my fault. I apologize. Allow me to start making amends by pecking this below...

In an interview with PBS on July 13, the candidate was discussing the viability of capitalism in America when she was asked about the current strong economy and low unemployment rate of 4%.

She responded: “I think the numbers that you just talked about is part of the problem, right? Because we look at these figures and we say, ‘Oh, unemployment is low, everything is fine, right?’ Well, unemployment is low because everyone has two jobs.”

I’ll make this point about the Unemployment Rate and then I will move on to today’s Foolishness...Or Is It? ... According to PolitiFact.com... “When the Bureau of Labor Statistics determines the unemployment rate, a person is counted as employed as long as they have at least one job. They don’t get counted twice if they have two jobs”.

 

In my self-proclaimed capacity as leader of the Imitation Smart People, I will analyze this for all of you using the Arithmetic I was taught by Sister Mary Luke...

Ø I’ll start by using a big inaccurate number by assuming we have 1,000,000 workers in the Good Ole USofA’s labor force.

Ø Let’s also assume we have 1,000,000 jobs in the Good Ole USofA.

Ø Let’s assume that 500,000 of our workers do not have jobs and 500,000 of our workers do have jobs.

Ø Let’s keep on assuming and assume that every one of the 500,000 workers who do have jobs actually have 2 jobs.

Ø According to our future Congresswoman this means that we have Full Employment in the Good Ole USofA because there are 1,000,000 jobs and there is a worker working in every one of those 1,000,000 jobs!

Ø Using logic and not arithmetic this means that the 500,000 who do not have jobs actually do have jobs because we have Full Employment in the Good Ole USofA and Full Employment means every worker has a job! (See above bullet point.)

 

If you are confused by all of this Irrefutable Logic and Arithmetic don’t feel badly. I have an advantage over you because Sister Mary Luke was very good at teaching Arithmetic and, I also was taught by Father Hatrel in High School and he told me, “Mathematics Is an Exact Science”.

 

Would I kid u?

Smartfella

 

Lagniappe: I don’t feel qualified to explain to you the difference between Arithmetic and Mathematics. I recommend you wait until this Future Congresswoman gets into Congress and then you can send her a Tweet and ask her. She’s getting sharper every day...Or is she?

 

Tuesday, August 07, 2018

My Potted Plant Outfit Has Come In Handy Again

Last week I put on my Potted Plant Outfit and went slithering around our Transportation Department in Washington D.C. to see what’s going on in the world of Transportation. It just so happened that I picked an action packed day to go slithering about.

 

It was absolute chaos! The office was full of advocates from People for the Advancement of the Right to Take Any Animal Anywhere who were busy advocating their cause.

 

You may not be aware that our Airlines are under assault by this and 32 other organizations of a similar persuasion.

 

Here is one of the conversations I overheard...

Ø Animal Advocate (AA) said, “Peacocks are not that big! An Ostrich is big but a Peacock is only large and large is not big”.

Ø Beleaguered Transportation Official (BTO) said, “Looks pretty big to me”. (What the BTO should have said, “That’s silly! Get the hell out of my office!”)

Ø BTO said, “Innocent passengers have been injured by Peacocks on Airline Flights”.

Ø AA said, “That’s an exaggeration! There has not been an Airline Peacock Attack since last week!”

Ø BTO said, “You may have a point. I’ll take that fact under advisement but first I will need to talk to that passenger who was attacked by that Peacock”. (What the BTO should have said, “That’s silly! Get the hell out of my office!”)

Ø AA said, “You will have to wait. He will not be out of the hospital till after Labor Day”.

Ø AA said, “I’ll bet you are not going to take the feelings of the Peacock Community into consideration, are you? Peacocks are people too. These proud sensitive animals have been raised to care for their emotionally challenged caregivers. Your preventing them from fulfilling their mission in life takes a very hard toll on their psychological makeup”.

Ø BTO said, “I never thought of that. I’ll be certain to call an emergency meeting of our Rules Committee right after lunch today to consider the very cogent point you just presented me with”. (What the BTO should have said, “That’s silly! Get the hell out of my office!”)

Ø BTO said, “While you are here, we should discuss Pooping by Birds on our planes. Our Janitorial Union has filed a grievance against this new rather unpleasant responsibility”.

Ø AA said, “Well I never! I am of a mind to file a counter grievance against their grievance with my Congressman. You may be aware that he is a proud owner of 2 Dogs, 1 Cat, an Iguana and a growing Baby Elephant. Just yesterday he told me he is planning to take a trip to his Tiny House on Lake Tahoe. You think you have trouble with my single Sensitive and Caring Peacock. You just wait!”

Ø BTO said, “Oh, my gosh and here I am only weeks before retirement!” (What the BTO should have said, “That’s silly! Get the hell out of my office!”)

 

The Bottom Line: As soon as our 9% Approval Rated Congress gets back from vacation it ought to pass a Federal Law that a BTO ought to be allowed to say to an AA, “That’s silly! Get the hell out of my office!”

 

Would I kid u?

Smartfella

 

Lagniappe: If you want to know more, read below but I warn you there is a lot of Silly and Frightening in this article...

 

Pets-on-Planes Crackdown by Airlines Gets Boost from U.S. Agency

By Alan Levin and Mary Schlangenstein

 

May 16, 2018

 

Regulators are making it easier for U.S. airlines to limit the growing number of dogs and other animals being brought onto flights by passengers saying they are needed for emotional or psychological support.

 

The Department of Transportation Wednesday said it won’t penalize airlines if they refuse to let passengers take aboard more than one support animal, demand assurance that a passenger has a disability or require proof of an animal’s vaccination and training. The agency also will allow airlines to impose “reasonable restrictions” on the movement of emotional-support animals in a plane’s cabin.

 

Service animals including seeing-eye dogs won’t be restricted under the proposed changes.

 

“The department has heard from the transportation industry, as well as individuals with disabilities, that the current regulation could be improved to ensure nondiscriminatory access for individuals with disabilities, while simultaneously preventing instances of fraud and ensuring consistency with other federal regulations,” the agency said in a release.

 

The DOT’s actions come as the three largest U.S. carriers have altered their policies on animals since the start of this year in reaction to soaring numbers of passengers claiming they needed them to provide emotional support. Those increased numbers also led to at least two incidents in which passengers were injured, including a man who suffered severe facial wounds from a dog last June on a Delta Air Lines Inc. flight.

 

Delta and United Continental Holdings Inc. in March began requiring 48-hour advance notice to travel with an emotional support animal, along with documents that could include proof the animal is trained and vaccinations are up to date, and a letter from a doctor or mental health worker on the person’s need for an animal or identifying the disability involved.

 

American Airlines Group Inc. said May 14 it will adopt similar policies July 1. The carriers have not changed policies for trained service animals used by people with visual or hearing impairments, seizures or mobility issues.

 

“Delta supports regulatory reform to further ensure the safety of all our customers and employees while supporting the rights of customers with legitimate needs for service animals,” said Ashton Kang, a spokeswoman.

 

Delta said in January it was flying about 700 service animals daily, a 150 percent increase since 2015. The company also reported an 84 percent rise since 2016 in “animal incidents,” including urine, feces and aggressive behavior.

 

United noted a 75 percent jump in animals on board from a year earlier, and a “significant increase” in onboard incidents involving them. American and United are banning certain animals totally from traveling in the cabin, including hedgehogs, ferrets, insects, rodents, snakes, spiders, amphibians, sugar gliders and non-household birds. American also barred those with tusks, horns or hooves, except for trained miniature horses acting as service animals.

 

The Transportation Department is also seeking public comment on possible new regulations to restrict the use of support animals.

 

The government should issue clearer guidance as soon as possible to deal with the “exponential increase” in passengers claiming the need for such animals, said Sara Nelson, international president of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA.

 

“Flight attendants and passengers have been bitten, attacked and inconvenienced by animals that are not properly trained to be in a confined public environment,” Nelson said. “This is interfering with the rights of our veterans and people with disabilities who legitimately need these animals to travel.”