This happens all the time...
One side of an argument presents irrefutable, undeniable and conclusive numbers that prove that their position is irrefutably, undeniably and conclusively correct.
The interviewer seems skeptical and says, “Where did you get your numbers?”
The Position Taker confidently says, “The Non-Partisan Congressional Budget Office”.
The interviewer has no comeback because the numbers came from the Non-Partisan Congressional Budget Office.
The show goes to commercial break.
After the break a representative of the other side of the argument is sitting there smiling where the first side of the argument guy sat smiling before the commercial break.
The Other Side of the Argument Guy presents his argument using irrefutable, undeniable and conclusive numbers that prove that his position is irrefutably, undeniably and conclusively correct.
The interviewer really seems skeptical now and says, “Where did you get your numbers?”
The Other Side Guy confidently says, “The Non-Partisan Congressional Budget Office”.
The interviewer has no comeback because the numbers came from the Non-Partisan Congressional Budget Office.
There is the possibility that the first side utilized a systematized transitional projection to reach its irrefutable position and the second side had the benefit of synchronized monitored contingency that made their argument bullet-proof.
Are you saying to yourself, where did those buzzwords in the prior paragraph come from? I got them from the Non-Partisan Congressional Budget Office. That means they are absolutely correct even though they make no sense at all…
- Is the Non-Partisan Congressional Budget Office being paid off?
- Maybe one side or the other (probably both) are lying about the numbers they got from the Non-Partisan Congressional Budget Office.
I’m getting carried away again. Neither of those two bullets above is possible. Certainly the one about lying is not possible. Our Congress has never lied to us...Or have they ever?
Would I kid u?
The Smartfella
