I say startling because they really seemed to be excited about their “discovery”.
I say “discovery” because that’s what they called it and they are a lot smarter than I am … Or are they?
This is what had them all in a tizzy (whatever that is)…
Monkey Primates of today and the Human Primates of today
evolved on two different evolutionary paths.
• Today there are Humans.
• Today there are Monkeys.
Does not that seem like the end of the argument? Should it even be called an “argument”? What is there to argue about? If there were not two separate and distinct evolutionary paths involved in this evolvement, we would have 535 Humkeys making laws for us in Congress. That would be terrible! … Or would it?
Would I kid u?