Recently an alleged bad guy (I hope I am not jumping to conclusions by calling him a bad guy) tried to abduct a small child. He was caught on camera as he ran away with his alleged victim.
Actually he was not "caught" by the camera after the local news outlet got finished protecting him. Below is a still picture from the actual video...
![clip_image001[5]](http://lh4.ggpht.com/-Uros-b7OVdA/VQzWxJw3khI/AAAAAAAABQo/17Ao093Wy3A/s1600-h/clip_image001%25255B5%25255D%25255B2%25255D.jpg "clip_image001[5]")
I know I'm The Noticer & you are not but did you see what this blog is toying around with?
You did not? I am so disappointed in you!…
They blocked out the facial features of the alleged bad guy!
If the news channel's spokesman were asked why they blocked out the alleged facial features of the alleged bad guy, would the spokesman have said something like…
"In the Good Ole USofA we are innocent until we are proven guilty. Besides, if we had shown his face, the police might have apprehended him.
What if his neighbors had seen his face? Would they have told the police it was him? Worse yet, would they have thought ill of him?"
Sometimes I experience brief moments of fear that I will run out of silliness to write about. In the future, when this fear starts to come on me, I'm going to say to myself…
"Relax, fella, it ain't gonna happen. Remember the alleged bad guy running away with his alleged small victim. There's a world of untapped foolishness coming your way."
Would I kid u?
Smartfella
(274)
2 comments:
Foolishness or abject stupidity?............there is very little that makes any sense to me in today's world!
It is because the news media thinks that their lawyers are right and if they show a photo or describe the abductor they will be sued. It may be that the police department blocked out the face for the same reason. First Kill All the Lawyers.
Post a Comment